[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: [at-l] re: Trail Blazes and trail preferences
- Subject: FW: [at-l] re: Trail Blazes and trail preferences
- From: "Nyberg, Peter K" <NybergPK@aetna.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 18:01:21 -0400
> From: Matt Perrenod
>
>
> Single blazes in most
> cases arrive every quarter mile or so. With this few blazes, every
> one
> is well-sited and well-maintained. In my opinion it works.
>
> - Priest
>
>
> I agree that this would usually work, and I've been annoyed by
> over-blazing on occasion myself. But at certain times of year a trail
> may be harder to follow. I have in mind a section hike I did in CT/MA
> in the fall several years ago. I got the timing close to perfect from
> both weather and leaf-peeping perspectives. But at several points
> along the way, the uniform layer of several inches of freshly fallen
> leaves on the forest floor, made the location of the trail difficult
> to determine. Since the blazes were generally no more than a few
> hundred feet apart, it didn't take too long to hunt one up. But at a
> quarter of a mile, this could have been much more of a challenge.
>
> I haven't done any winter camping in many years, but I would imagine
> the same problem might occur with freshly fallen snow. Which reminds
> me of another problem with AT blazes. Surely I'm not the only person
> who has had trouble following a trail in winter because the blazes are
> the same color as the snow. I'd like to suggest changing the color of
> one or the other, which ever would be less controversial.
>
> Peter
>
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *
==============================================================================