Re: Re: [at-l] Extending the AT

[SaraSW@aol.com]

John Ellis wrote regarding Wingfoot's post on an extended At

> Is there some fear of loss of bragging rights?  Correct me if I am wrong,
>but you don't need to be a thru hiker to enjoy the AT.  How about the
>common woman? 

As a common woman--oops--maybe that's not exactly what I mean. Anyway, 
I'm not going to summarize anything already so well said, but neither of 
these things came through to me at all. I wasn't sure what I felt about 
the issue before reading Wingfoot's post, but his very well reasoned 
argument convinced me. Let there be trails everywhere, but don't call 
them the AT.

Sally

* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *

==============================================================================

---

• Prev by Date: [at-l] anyone else on the approach trail this weekend?
• Next by Date: Re: [at-l] Extending the AT
• Prev by thread: Re: [at-l] Extending the AT
• Next by thread: Re: [at-l] Extending the AT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread