[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] An argument for a light pack
- Subject: Re: [at-l] An argument for a light pack
- From: Kurtis Kirsch <kurt.kirsch@internetmci.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 21:52:09 -0500
-- [ From: Kurtis Kirsch * EMC.Ver #2.3 ] --
While I applaud your advocacy for a light pack, what's the hurry? Does
more miles a day mean more hiking enjoyment? If we paved the trail, and
grade it at not more than a 10 degree rise or fall, just think of the miles
we could do! Yes, I'm obnoxious, but I don't hike "pyramids." I hike
mountain trails with boots, but I hike as light as I feel is possible. I
love hiking, and sometimes I even semi-jog down gentler downhills, however
I only do it when I feel like it, not to do more miles in a day. If your
thing is to hike as many miles as you can a day, then your pyramid sceme
may work. A thru-hiker from last year constently carried a 55 to 60 lb
pack, and hiked a totally pure hike, except for a forced 70 mile slackpack,
when the pack was stolen in PA. She says it was the worst part of her
hike.
I think that you and Ray Jardine have every right to hike your own hike,
and to express your views on hiking, however, I feel it's a bit
condesending of ray to characterize his hike as the top of the pyramid, my
hike in the middle of the pyramid, and my thru-hiker friend at the bottom
of the pyramid. If someone enjoys their hike, then they are on top of the
world in my book!
have fun,
Kurt
kurt.kirsch@internetmci.com
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *
==============================================================================