[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: running shoes/trailrunning/thru-run
I've run into a lot of people who have opinions about the purpose of the AT.
I haven't found very many of them who have read Benton MacKaye's proposal.
It's available on the AT homepage - go read it. Thruhiking was NOT one of the
uses that MacKaye foresaw for the Trail. So a thruhiker who doesn't like
trail runners would need to come up with a better reason than original intent
to convince me that runners shouldn't be out there. If original intent were
the criteria then thruhikers shouldn't be out there either.
A runner may not see the same trail that I see, but then no two "traditional"
thruhikers have exactly the same trail experience either.
Let's get back to the ONLY two "rules" that I recognize on the Trail - 1/ Hike
your own hike and 2/ respect others right to hike their own hike.
Go do it - just honk when you want to pass.
>And one more time, how about the thru-run attempt at 52 days? What
> issues about trail usage does this bring up?
>Ummm how bout that is not what the trail was invisioned for?
>What's the point? Name in the local paper?
> I may have some answers and alternate points of view. At the same
>time, I recognize that a traditional thru-hiker might look with
>distain at some guy blasting thru who isn't even going to sleep on
> I hope this generates some interesting discussion.