[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OT: Re: Was Re: [at-l] Not hiking related Now?
- Subject: OT: Re: Was Re: [at-l] Not hiking related Now?
- From: greyowl at rcn.com (greyowl@rcn.com)
- Date: Wed Mar 15 11:09:11 2006
A non-believer that keeps going forward :-) Actually politically
I am a progressive with not party labels (but if beer is present I
will be there) and I am an athiest that likes to hike. There I
made it trail related.
Grey Owl
PS
Just finished wading through the USDA's Budget. Is there a
politician in the world that can add 2 + 2 and come up with 4?
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:53:00 -0500
>From: Gary Ticknor <garyticknor@starpower.net>
>Subject: OT: Re: Was Re: [at-l] Not hiking related Now?
>To: greyowl@rcn.com
>Cc: Kurt Cedergren <kcedergren@gmail.com>,
GoVolsKelly@aol.com, at-l@backcountry.net
>
>What the Hell is a progressive atheist??!
>
>- Greenbriar
>
>greyowl@rcn.com wrote:
>> ...
>> I am the only progressive athiest of the group...
>>
>> Peace
>>
>> Grey Owl
>>