[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Appalachian Mountain Top Removal
- Subject: [at-l] Appalachian Mountain Top Removal
- From: Bror8588 at aol.com (Bror8588@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Mar 8 15:46:21 2006
In a message dated 3/8/2006 4:21:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
sloetoe@yahoo.com writes:
> RoksnRoots@aol.com writes:
> But heck, who are we fooling. These people plan to
> develop it all and simply label it important
> national economy needs.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~
> There is an industry that makes financial gain by
> selling its products to hikers, ...(who$e voice$
$hould be tapped) > Skylander Jack
### I would observe (as many before me) it's even
bigger than that: that it *IS* "national economy
needs." There is a unique American Spirit that glories
in a sense of self-reliance, societal independence,
economic entrepreneurship, and spiritual merit, that
each are developed, tested in, and sustained by, just
the sorts of tests provided in feeling "small" in the
woods (and coming metaphorically out the other side).
We have mostly lost that spirit, and we have a moral
decline and increpitude that reaches to the highest of
corporate and governmental heights, only to be matched
by a fiberless sense of civil duty among the
"citizens" of this free society. Holy crud, but we are
in deep shit. Muir said "In Wilderness is the
preservation of the world." Indeed.
Therefore, it is the voices that speak loudest with the greatest urgency and
which affect the local community that are heard. Whose voice will speak to
the heart of the community? After all, it is not the whole trail that is
voted upon when each community allows construction and development on land in
their community but just the portion that goes through it and the history of
acquisition may have left a bad taste in the mouths of the community and there
may be stories (legends) that have filtered down through the years that
impact the feelings of the locals to vote one way or another. If the local
community has experienced rude behavior on the part of some Thru-hiker or even
someday hiker the whole trail gets tarnished in reputation. What is needed are
advocates in each community that highlight the value of the trail and the
benefits that it affords to each member of the community such as tourists who use
the motels, those who buy products in the stores, those who use the
restaurants, and other examples of economic benefit. In addition the access to the
trail by members of the community for exercise, and communication with Nature
or just having a place to enjoy solitude. Local High Schools, Scouting
organizations, Church Youth groups, Birding organizations, as well as the hunters
and fishermen/women who enjoy time in the woods. The AT is indeed a valuable
resource. It takes effort to promote its benefits and it needs people who
can speak a word of advocacy for its protection.
Skylander Jack