[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Wind Farm Proposed at DeHart Dam
- Subject: [at-l] Wind Farm Proposed at DeHart Dam
- From: camojack at comcast.net (camojack@comcast.net)
- Date: Wed Jan 18 18:38:42 2006
So, alternative energy is good...but not if we have to see it being produced.
WTF?!
-"Camo"
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Steve Landis <s.landis@comcast.net>
> *http://tinyurl.com/c8qk9*
> also
> *http://tinyurl.com/7kkgc
> *...
> "The Rush Twp. property is mostly remote mountain land, but is close to
> Fort Indiantown Gap and the Appalachian Trail."
> ...
> "The wind strengths on the ridges above DeHart Dam range from 12.5 to
> 15.7 mph, earning them a U.S. Department of Energy rank of "marginal" to
> "fair."
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> AT-L Mailing List.
>
> Go here to unsubscribe or change your options:
>
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l From nightwalker.at at gmail.com Wed Jan 18 20:13:36 2006
From: nightwalker.at at gmail.com (Frank Looper)
Date: Wed Jan 18 20:20:56 2006
Subject: [at-l] Wind Farm Proposed at DeHart Dam
References: <011920060031.15872.43CEDDC5000F0CA800003E002200761064050C0E0601030E0C@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <000601c61c9d$f580a5d0$0902a8c0@franks>
> So, alternative energy is good...but not if we have to see it being
> produced.
>
> WTF?!
>
> -"Camo"
>
That's certainly what I've been hearing...