[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Maine Wind Farms
- Subject: [at-l] Maine Wind Farms
- From: greyowl at rcn.com (greyowl@rcn.com)
- Date: Wed Dec 28 14:48:02 2005
I always find this subject interesting each time that it is brought
up. The US government is interested in the security of the
energy grid, but they do not dictate where and how the grid
should be built. That is decided by the power companies and
the local or state governments. That is why I always think
globaly but act locally. Go ahead with your conspiracy theories,
but it does all come down to money. The federal government
has cut taxes, this is good. The amount of money that is
returned to the states is reduced. This is bad. A lot of state
governments have cut state taxes to return money to its
citizens. This is good. But now they don't have money for
eductation, medicare or medicaid. This is bad. XYZ power
company says that they will build a wind farm at such and such
location and will generat $X of taxes. Is this good? Do you
wan the taxs to pay for your medicare medicai or do you not
want the wind farm and let your great grand children pay off
your medical expenses? There are no simple answers and the
answer given on this list have clearly demonstrated that few, if
any, put their mind in gear before they put their mouth in gear.
That is all I going to say.
Bob Grey Owl Dudley
Oh, before you blame the republicrats take a look in the mirror.
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:28:29 -0500
>From: Jim Bullard <jbullar1@twcny.rr.com>
>Subject: Re: [at-l] Maine Wind Farms
>To: Bob C <ellen@clinic.net>, AT-L@Backcountry.net
>
>At 11:18 AM 12/28/2005 -0500, Bob C wrote:
>>Comments by the many skilled photographers on AT-L are
welcome. Please
>>offer any help you can about how best to word and
document this message.
>
>Well you could start by noting that the term "scenic" implies
natural
>views, not industrial structures. Are these people who will be
moved by
>aesthetic arguments? I doubt it. Their eye's are too clouded
by $$$$ to see
>beyond the potential profits. I certainly would not be inclined
to go take
>pictures of wind towers and if I want to shoot photos of
spinning flashing
>lights, a carnival would be a better location. All this will do is
spoil
>the natural view.
>
>In one of his books on nature photography, the internationally
famous
>photographer Galen Rowell commented on the explosion of
power lines, etc.
>in recent years. He showed 2 views of a very remote
mountain scene that he
>had shot a few years apart. The later view had a line of
electric or phone
>poles running right through it. Sad. Really sad. I can't tell you
how many
>times I have found a great view but either didn't take the
picture or had
>to clone out objectionable man-made objects (mostly power
lines/cell
>towers) because they spoiled the scene.
>
>What makes it doubly sad is that they could just as easily
build them where
>there was not a scenic view that rates as a National Treasure.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AT-L Mailing List.
>
>Go here to unsubscribe or change your options:
>
>http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l