[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] On the how was, too.

Subject: [at-l] On the how was, too.
From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
Date: Sun Dec 11 15:50:36 2005
In-reply-to: <1134320237.439c5a6d30f2b@mail.bluemarble.net>
References: <199.4cef83b8.30cdb266@aol.com> <199.4cef83b8.30cdb266@aol.com>

At 11:57 AM 12/11/2005 -0500, Felix wrote:
>Quoting Slyatpct@aol.com:
>
>
> >
> > > She was efficient 20 years ago. I'm about ready for a new one,
> > > though. 'greenest'...that's good, right?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure what kind Bob and Pat Peoples have in their residence but 
> it was
> >
> > nice (with the glass doors) and hot!
>
>
>Mine is actually a wood-burning furnace that is in the basement and is
>ductworked and blowered and all. Just like a 'real' furnace only the door 
>opens
>and you (in this case I) put wood in and it burns. Me loves it. She ain't as
>airtight as she once was, though. Who of us is?

The loss of air-tightedness usually comes from the gasket around the 
loading door. Those are replaceable.

Follow-Ups:
- [at-l] On the how was, too.
  - From: ellen at clinic.net (Bob C)

References:
- [at-l] On the how was, too.
  - From: Slyatpct at aol.com (Slyatpct@aol.com)
- [at-l] On the how was, too.
  - From: athiker at smithville.net (Felix)

Prev by Date: [at-l] busted knee
Next by Date: [at-l] busted knee
Previous by thread: [at-l] On the how was, too.
Next by thread: [at-l] On the how was, too.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread