[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Trail Concern
- Subject: [at-l] Trail Concern
- From: RoksnRoots at aol.com (RoksnRoots@aol.com)
- Date: Fri Nov 4 13:07:08 2005
In a message dated 11/4/2005 1:51:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
s.landis@comcast.net writes:
*
*
*
locating an industrial park so close to the trail. The warehouse
location is now closer to the trail than the agreement stipulated."
*
*
*
I can assure you:
1) The warehouse was built there because land by the Trail is now
becoming some of the only open space remaining.
2) The person who sued in order to plant a warehouse adjacent
to the buffer would have built right over the top of the Trail if not
prevented.
- The only way you can have an effective AT is to get the public to
agree on it...
*