[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] SORUCK Food-Initial plans



I am glad that you mentioned this Doug. Meatloaf for 120 or so ppl (what I
think we can logically expect as attendees this year) would be alone about
$200.00. I hope everyone doesn't mind if there is a contribution jar for
Saturday night.

Dawg


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Mathews" <mathews@uga.edu>
To: "Gadog430" <gadog430@charter.net>
Cc: "At-list" <at-l@backcountry.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: [at-l] SORUCK Food-Initial plans


> Gee,
>
> Makes me hungry right now.  Excuse my feeble mind and we may have
> done it last year but with the increasing large number of folks
> attending, it seems a trifle unfair for a couple of folks to shoulder
> the bulk of providing for a couple of meals.  Could we/did we/do we
> need to take up some contributions to a food fund that would be
> divided among those doing heavy duty in this area?  Seems only fair to me.
>
> Mainframe
>
> At 11:15 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote:
> >Since a lot of people are sort of in a 'Post Gathering' mood, I
> >thought maybe everyone would like to hear the initial plans for food
> >at the SORUCK. What hiker doesn't want to talk food? No one that I
> >know. So here goes:
> >
> >The menu up to now.
> >
> >Friday night: Potluck Spaghetti, salad and garlic bread.   Side
> >dishes, meats, soups, etc.
> >
> >Sat. breakfast by OB blueberry pancakes, sausage, bacon, OJ
> >
> >Sat lunch: Grilled cheese sandwiches, ham & cold cuts, etc.
> >Breads, soups, potato/mac salad, chips, pickles, etc.
> >
> >Sat dinner by Dawg meatloaf etc.
> >
> >Sun. breakfast by Miss Janet
> >
> >Sun. lunch leftovers?
> >
> >Does anyone have any suggestions for additions?
> >One thing I know we are going to need this year is a commitment for
> >a few more coffee makers.
> >We didn't have nearly enough.
> >
> >Let me hear from you on initial thoughts. I can't wait to see
> >everyone in a few months.
> >Lot's of living between now and then though.
> >Dawg
>
>