[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Hourly Calory Use -- [Was: Re: [at-l] Re: Weight Loss]
- Subject: Hourly Calory Use -- [Was: Re: [at-l] Re: Weight Loss]
- From: greyowl at rcn.com (greyowl@rcn.com)
- Date: Thu Aug 25 10:50:23 2005
What and violate the second law of thermodynamics??!! The
amount of work that is done is dependent only on the mass of
the object and the distance that is to be moved. (I really
enjoyed college physics especially quantum physics)
Grey Owl
>You can't really reduce it to a formula except in a generalized
sense. Take
>Lance Armstrong for instance. He has an over sized heart and
higher than
>normal muscle efficiency (the capacity to turn fuel into
energy). If an
>individual's circulatory system is less efficient at getting fuel to
the
>muscles, if your muscles (in particular those muscles used for
a given
>activity) are of a less efficient type than the average then you
will burn
>more calories than the charts/calculators indicate. It also
would vary with
>how often you do it. As you become more accustomed to the
activity your
>efficiency may improve and you will burn fewer calories for
the same amount
>of exercise. I also suspect that running a given distance burns
more
>calories than walking it just as driving 'X' miles at 80 mph
burns more gas
>than driving the same distance at 50 mph.