[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
- Subject: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
- From: shane at theplacewithnoname.com (Shane Steinkamp)
- Date: Wed Aug 3 19:12:17 2005
- In-reply-to: <19d.3918710e.302296cf@aol.com>
> > I guess you're trying to say that the AT is animate and not
> > meant for people?
> Animate, yes, incredibly so. So much so that it should never be
> prone to, or have to answer to, casual indifference.
OK.
> Again Shane, we have discussed enough that the strawman
> of trying to pose me as saying the AT isn't meant for people
> exposes your methods for what they are. This issue of being
> "meant for people" is something you invented in order to confuse
> the provable scientific realities we've covered. It is, as
> you quoted me, disingenuous sophistry...
There you go again. You're boring me. Real easy. Is or is not the trail
mean for people?
> Yours dissipated in a smokescreen of accusations of personal
> attack...
Actually, you're the one that keeps talking about ME. Don't you read your
own posts?
Shane