[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG

Subject: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
From: shane at theplacewithnoname.com (Shane Steinkamp)
Date: Mon Aug 1 14:40:20 2005
References: <BAY104-F148D79AD0B955CBB71EF86A0C30@phx.gbl>

> Oh yeah - and then there's ORR - who's taking a satphone and GPS with him.
I
> wonder how many here  have any idea how GOOD an idea that is - for the
place
> he's going?  I'm pretty sure Shane knows about that.  But he probably also
> knows that it's not as necessary as some people think.

I'd rather have a gun and extra ammo than a sat phone in that
situation...but that opens a whole other can of werms...  Navigation on that
scale doesn't require a GPS, and extra batteries are hard to come by.  Never
trust anything electronic in the woods...

Shane

Follow-Ups:
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: rafeb at speakeasy.net (Rafe Bustin)

References:
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: spiriteagle99 at hotmail.com (Jim and/or Ginny Owen)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
Next by Date: [at-l] Re: On topic if you carry a cell on the trail... OT iyoudon't
Previous by thread: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
Next by thread: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread