[at-l] "Human crap"

[shane at theplacewithnoname.com (Shane Steinkamp)]

> I agree that the Trail exists primarily for the
> benefit of humans.
>
> But the Trail is nothing without being (mostly) wild,
> or "as wild as possible."

Agreed

> Being pro-Trail means protecting its wildlife.

Agreed.

> There's no contradiction there.

I never said there was.

It's important to understand that the trail exists primarily for humans,
however.  I am trying to point out that a certain member seems to think that
the trail has a "wilderness purpose", and that's all.

Shane