[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Re: at-l Cell Phones, yet again - the 'rules'
- Subject: [at-l] Re: at-l Cell Phones, yet again - the 'rules'
- From: greyowl at rcn.com (greyowl@rcn.com)
- Date: Tue Apr 19 08:14:31 2005
I think that thiw was the Royal We i.e We are not amused!!!
:-)
>We want to
>get away from the everyday humdrum of life, so we go for a
hike, then we
>have to take all the trappings and security(?) of everyday
life with us.
>What a paradox!
>
>
>
>WE? This list is too diverse to use that word except in the
broadest sense,
>e.g., WE all like to hike! (but even that is perhaps a stretch
though it
>fits over 99% of us (this figure is from my very astute
mysterious
>prognostication system or some would say -- a good
guess). On any other topic on this
>list the favorably disposed and the ones opposed have a
different ratio. This
>is a diverse group of people and not everyone has the same
opinions about
>anything.
>
>Skylander
>_______________________________________________
>at-l mailing list
>at-l@backcountry.net
>http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l