[at-l] hiking poles revisted redux

[daveh at psknet.com (David Hicks)]

FWIIW -- I have hike far more miles with a single (as in one-at-a-time, not 
the same one for all those years :-o}) "natural" (most of them bamboo) pole, 
that I have hiked with the pair of the high tech style, which I now use.

And, I, too, found Mags' observation valid, albeit not my current style.  As 
always HYOH for in fact (most likely) YMMV.

Chainsaw

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sloetoe" <sloetoe@yahoo.com>
To: <at-l@backcountry.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 1:31 PM
Subject: [at-l] hiking poles revisted redux


>>
SNIP
As someone who has hiked (all them) miles with bamboo BECAUSE
bamboo is lighter, cheaper, stronger, and (well) "prettier" than
anything else out there, I found Mags' observation right on
target.
SNIP
<<