[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] 2005 SORUCK location change...
- Subject: [at-l] 2005 SORUCK location change...
- From: gadog430 at charter.net (Gadog430)
- Date: Sat Dec 4 21:36:52 2004
- References: <59.1c2f3700.2ee3d7e2@aol.com>
You know what, this is going to turn into "He said...She said."
Let me know when you guys decide on a location.
Dawg
----- Original Message -----
From: Slyatpct@aol.com
To: thornel@attglobal.net
Cc: at-l@mailman.backcountry.net
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] 2005 SORUCK location change...
In a message dated 12/4/2004 9:52:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
thornel@attglobal.net writes:
> That memory is clear for me.
>
>
Feel free to check the archives. My memory says, your memory isn't very
clear.
> You "suggested" after the reservations were
> made and all was committed.
>
>
Since, the Goose Creek cabins were too cold, too far and had too many lowly
hikers, you switched to Amicalola Falls without any help from attendees or list
members.
> I suggested that the GARUCK would do well with
> other regional RUCKs such as NC, TN, VA, etc.
Yes, you did do that.
> We now have two large RUCKs
> that require a significant amount of effort and planning by a few
> volunteers. A precious few.
>
Volunteers to do what? Make a few phone calls and list requests. Come on
OB, it ain't that tough and we're here every day.
> Smaller RUCKs would require less effort and > would attract folks more
> active in > their region.
>
Same few phone calls and list requests. Are you once again suggesting on
spliting up?
>
> So, if you wish to help Pittsburg, make some calls and let us know what is
> available.
>
Already said I would.
_______________________________________________
at-l mailing list
at-l@backcountry.net
http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l