[at-l] Did Anybody Else Get This One?

[spiriteagle99 at hotmail.com (Jim and/or Ginny Owen)]

I'm glad I've been too busy to look at this stuff all day.  But now that I'm 
here for the next 10 minutes - three points:

1.  A legitimate blog wouldn't publish something like that without links to 
sites that would back up the assertions.

2. The story is garbage.  First because this kind of thing wouldn't have 
stayed buried this long if there'd been any truth to it.  Scott has had too 
much publicity for that to happen.  Second because there are too many 
references to back up the history that he's openly published.  And third, 
because there are those on other forums who have made similar accusations 
against people they don't like.  Baltimore Jack has been been one of the 
targets of some of these nasty and asinine accusations. Finally - as 
Skylander sorta said - he's innocent until proven guilty.
Letting your prejudices run away with your common sense isn't very bright.

3. Jim Bullard's summary is pretty good.  The other side of the story can be 
found here:

http://www.psychoheresy-aware.org/mmbf35.html

http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/m&m/general.htm

http://www.ctlibrary.com/1222

http://www.ctlibrary.com/ct/1996/sept16/6ta076.html

Grandpa taught me to believe half of what I see, a third of what I read and 
a quarter of what I hear.  And to double check the parts I do believe.  It's 
been good advice.
Walk softly,
Jim