[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] time, again...
- Subject: [at-l] time, again...
- From: rcli4 at comcast.net (rcli4@comcast.net)
- Date: Sat Oct 30 17:58:18 2004
0.857142857142857142857...... of a minute or almost a second :>))
Did you ever get your movie?
Clyde
-------------- Original message --------------
> If something will allow me to do something '70 times faster'...how long
> will it take me to do it? I mean...if it currently takes me a minute to
> do something, and I start doing it 70 times faster, how long will it
> take me?
>
> --
> Felix J.
> ME-->GA '98
> "Your Move"
> ALT '03 KT '03
> http://Felixhikes.tripod.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l From AThiker at smithville.net Sat Oct 30 17:03:22 2004
From: AThiker at smithville.net (Felix)
Date: Sat Oct 30 18:17:13 2004
Subject: [at-l] time, again...
In-Reply-To: <103020042244.448.4184195A0006B44B000001C02200745672CB07040C9D@comcast.net>
References: <103020042244.448.4184195A0006B44B000001C02200745672CB07040C9D@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <41841DBA.3010302@smithville.net>
rcli4@comcast.net wrote:
>0.857142857142857142857...... of a minute or almost a second :>))
>
So, if I did it 80 times faster, it would be like it never needed to be
done in the first place??
>Did you ever get your movie?
>
No :( (Should I have?)