[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] That Crazy Cot/Pack Again
- Subject: [at-l] That Crazy Cot/Pack Again
- From: RoksnRoots at aol.com (RoksnRoots@aol.com)
- Date: Thu Oct 28 12:43:17 2004
In a message dated 10/28/2004 8:40:56 AM Eastern Standard Time,
s.landis@comcast.net writes:
*
*
*
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/patents/us/488/4883206/4883206.pdf
*
*
*
Obviously somebody was thinking of this before myself.
I looked at the patent description included in Steve's link. This
guy has the idea, but he's gone the "contraption" route. As Steve noted, it
looks heavy.
The first thing wrong with this guy's idea is it isn't a
long-distance design. It's obviously overkill on the frame. The cot is unnecessarily high
off the ground. 3-4 inches would be enough to allow for fabric sag and ground
clearance. This guy is over a foot off the ground from the looks of it.
Next mistake is his trying to do too much with one invention. The
tent portion is too much extra design and riggings. It's unnecessary. A tarp with
some Lekis would cover that end without the extra weight and design of his
model.
I found a serious flaw in this man's design which makes me think his
patent is a theoretical one off the blueprints and not really thought out. If
you go to the link and look at his diagram of the pack being carried you'll
see it is so narrow that it fits within the width of his back. Then look at the
cot mode diagram and there's no expansion joint for width. In other words, the
cot is supposed to be as wide as the backpack. If you slept on this you would
be hanging over the sides by 4 inches on each side like sleeping on a rail.
Critical design flaw that makes me doubt this man's design competency. (Not to
mention the "contraption " look). He also doesn't have enough back padding to
carry that frame in his harness.
My design would be better because it would eliminate all that extra,
unnecessary frame. All you need is 3-4 inches clearance - not a foot or more
clearance. And you don't need any flying tubes over the danged thing for tent
poles. This guy is obviously a poindexter designer and way far from hiking
trends.
Imagine the same sort of thing except the pack frame is virtually
flat to the back like a Jansport. The bottom would have an "L" extension of
"U" bars jutting out like a freighter frame bottom rest. These would detach and
become the legs for the cot. The difference being the frame (and therefore
the pack fabric) would have to expand width-wise in order to be wide enough to
sleep entirely inside the cot. Very simple. This man has way overcomplicated
the design...
.