[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] (no subject)
- Subject: [at-l] (no subject)
- From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
- Date: Fri Sep 3 08:32:47 2004
- In-reply-to: <f5.4043370c.2e69c4a4@aol.com>
At 08:59 AM 9/3/2004 -0400, Bror8588@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 9/3/04 07:28:56 Eastern Daylight Time, rcli4@comcast.net
>writes:
>
>
> > 8. Arnold is REALLY big in person
> >
>
>I met Arnold at a book signing in 1982 (approximate date) and my impression
>was that he was smaller than expected. He had already won his title in body
>building, but was not "pumped up" and it may also be true that today's
>Arnold is
>an aged Arnold with the normal accumulation of avoirdupois or increased body
>mass that seems to be prevalent among those fifty and older.
>
>Hmm... Now, that I mention it, perhaps that is MY problem. Old age equals
>the accumulation of avoirdupois. Well, no wonder I have gained weight.
Size is relative. If you are smaller than Arnold, he's big. I weigh about
the same as Arnold but his weight is a bit better distributed. :)