[at-l] What's Wrong with This Picture?

[shellydhale at earthlink.net (Shelly Hale)]

Thing about all of this is that we keep fighting off nature.  In the natural
course of things, animals would prolly make us meals a lot more often than
they do now cuz of civilization.  We jumped right to the top of the food
chain and haven't looked back.  And, many more of us would have been gone by
now due to disease and illness, but then again...we keep finding ways to
defeat that too.  Oh, sure...the real enemy in America today is the boob
tube and couch set on sale at Wal-Mart for $9.99 followed by the Big Mac at
the McD's on the way out the door.

The measures that "God" put in place to keep the environment naturally
balanced keep being pushed farther and farther back in the scope of natural
selection.  Now...don't get me wrong...I hate to be sick or in pain, so I'm
thankful for medical miracles and not having to worry so much about being a
snack for something in the everyday way of things.

I'm just sayin'.....

Shelly Hale

Commit to a Girl today!
https://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=57489&lis=1&kntae57489=778D7D87CF3F4328A80EE71738F9FF48&supId=46801774
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Felix" <AThiker@smithville.net>
Cc: <at-l@backcountry.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] What's Wrong with This Picture?


> jmmiele@optonline.net wrote:
>
> >Here's where I get everyone in an uproar  ;-)
> >
> >If people don't stop having children, we can look forward to more and
more "sanctuaries" in every corner that used to have trees, streams and
wildlife.
> >
>
>
> Finally!!! Someone agrees with me that there are too damned many people.
> I've grown weary of the idea that you have to have more 'people' in an
> area so it gets more funding and projex and this and that. There are too
> many of us...face it. I don't agree with what seems to be a 'keep up
> with the other side' position Jim talked about. 'If we have fewer
> children, then there will be fewer 'green' people to fight our fight'
> seems to the gist of it. It's pretty simple math...if The Smiths have
> five kids...they'll need five homes to live in. (This is nothing
> personal against anybody named 'Smith', mind ya.) (Well, maybe those
> with five kids.) That's all I'm sayin'.  So, what has Bush done lately??
> Paved over Old Faithful yet?    :-))
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l