[at-l] What's Wrong with This Picture?

[AThiker at smithville.net (Felix)]

jmmiele@optonline.net wrote:

>Here's where I get everyone in an uproar  ;-)
>
>If people don't stop having children, we can look forward to more and more "sanctuaries" in every corner that used to have trees, streams and wildlife.
>


Finally!!! Someone agrees with me that there are too damned many people. 
I've grown weary of the idea that you have to have more 'people' in an 
area so it gets more funding and projex and this and that. There are too 
many of us...face it. I don't agree with what seems to be a 'keep up 
with the other side' position Jim talked about. 'If we have fewer 
children, then there will be fewer 'green' people to fight our fight' 
seems to the gist of it. It's pretty simple math...if The Smiths have 
five kids...they'll need five homes to live in. (This is nothing 
personal against anybody named 'Smith', mind ya.) (Well, maybe those 
with five kids.) That's all I'm sayin'.  So, what has Bush done lately?? 
Paved over Old Faithful yet?    :-))