[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Baxter State Park History Question

Subject: [at-l] Baxter State Park History Question
From: jplynch at crosslink.net (James Lynch)
Date: Sat Apr 17 23:20:54 2004
In-reply-to: <75.273ae948.2db351e4@aol.com>
References: <75.273ae948.2db351e4@aol.com>

The term "park" of course means different things to different people.  I 
think its clear that Gov. Baxter didn't intend it to be a "National 
Park" type of park.  Not that that's bad, just not what he intended.

Snodrog5@aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 4/17/04 11:07:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
>rickboudrie@hotmail.com writes:
>
>  
>
>>Didn't Baxter intend this place to 
>>be a park?
>>
>>    
>>

James P. ("Jim") Lynch
jplynch@crosslink.net
Note: I use an aggessive spam filter.  If you send me an email and you haven't gotten a reply in a few days (and you expect one), send me another and make sure its plain text only.

Follow-Ups:
- [at-l] Baxter State Park History Question
  - From: ellen at clinic.net (Bob C.)

References:
- [at-l] Baxter State Park History Question
  - From: Snodrog5 at aol.com (Snodrog5@aol.com)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Baxter State Park History Question
Next by Date: [at-l] Buffer around Baxter?
Previous by thread: [at-l] Baxter State Park History Question
Next by thread: [at-l] Baxter State Park History Question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread