[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze

Subject: [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
From: daveh at psknet.com (Dave Hicks)
Date: Thu Mar 18 10:24:14 2004
References: <128.3ce88d29.2d893e9e@aol.com> <004f01c40c32$a645d8f0$a25ca441@computer> <21258416.20040318110438@clinic.net>

Let's just agree to disagree on the offset blazes.

I like them, but I know that I am a minority among the older maintainers.

Chainsaw

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net>
To: "Dave Hicks" <daveh@psknet.com>
Cc: <AT-L@Backcountry.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:04 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze

Chainsaw:

 The ATC plan sounds like a good one to me. Now if they would only eliminate
 those off set blazes.

 Weary

References:
- [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
  - From: RoksnRoots at aol.com (RoksnRoots@aol.com)
- [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
  - From: daveh at psknet.com (Dave Hicks)
- [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
  - From: ellen at clinic.net (Bob C.)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
Next by Date: [at-l] blazing frequently assumes "nice" conditions
Previous by thread: [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
Next by thread: [at-l] Enhancing the AT Blaze
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread