[at-l] (OT) Global Climate Change

[mapster at charter.net (Frank Looper)]

It seems the boundaries changed when folks in the scientific community
noticed a problem with the coexistence of the two.

Any system without outside influences devolves, therefore, I suppose, the
earth has to be called a sub-system. BUT name me one other system that's
shown the Law of Entropy (the 2nd law of thermodynamics) to be in need of a
re-write? I doubt that you can without stretching the rules.

Either way, it won't matter to me. I'm one of those wild-eyed "creationists"
that get snickered at so much, and you'd have a hard time convincing me that
a lie was the truth any-old-ways.  :-)

Frank Looper
Entropy in Action...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J Bryan Kramer" <jbryankramer@msn.com>
To: "Frank Looper" <mapster@charter.net>; "Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net>
Cc: <RoksnRoots@aol.com>; <AT-L@backcountry.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [at-l] (OT) Global Climate Change


> If you have a problem with that you aren't defining your boundaries
> properly, entropy increases in the universe but in subsets of the universe
> that is not always correct.
>
> Bryan
>
>  Samuel Adams advised, "Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
> and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for
the
> sake of the latter."
>
> > >From folks who can believe the theory of evolution at the same
> > time as the
> > 2nd law of thermodynamics? I don't always listen to what they say
without
> > a pound of salt...
>
>