[at-l] Wet feet

[Lwop at att.net (LWOP)]

I only made that statement because I have hiked many, many thousands of miles and never got a blister on my feet.  I take good care of my feet.  I was just pointing out that I am interested in the benefits of either type of boot and eliminating blisters from the equation.
Lwop
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ARTCLOUTMN@aol.com 
  To: Lwop@att.net ; at-l@backcountry.net 
  Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 9:18 AM
  Subject: Re: [at-l] Wet feet



  In a message dated 2/22/04 1:16:05 AM, Lwop@att.net writes:



    Neither of these boots will cause me blisters as I have a couple hundred miles of break-in on both.



  I wouldn't bank on it.  Your boots are going to change shape as you hike and so will your feet.  I've heard from many hikers who have experienced blisters from boots that had more than 400 miles breakin time.

                                               Art