[at-l] Baker? Katahdin?

[jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)]

At 09:30 PM 12/15/2003 -0500, Snodrog5@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 12/15/03 8:43:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>jbullar1@twcny.rr.com writes:
>
> > That was condescending.
>
>Yup, I know.
>I've been told I'm a 'reflector' as far as communication is concerned. I
>understand your question, Jim. Really I do. But if you don't like my 
>answer to it,
>what am I supposed to do? Change it simply because you repeated your
>question? Engage in pointless hypotheticals? Sorry, but I meant what I said.
>Teej

When you engage in slamming the AMC when there were no other buyers who 
would have been preferable, you are "engaging in pointless 
hypotheticals".  It's like the person who didn't vote bitching about who 
won the election.