[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] AMC's "miscues" in the 100 Mile
- Subject: [at-l] AMC's "miscues" in the 100 Mile
- From: ARTCLOUTMN at aol.com (ARTCLOUTMN@xxxxxxx)
- Date: Sun Dec 14 15:36:11 2003
> In a message dated 12/14/03 10:17:31 AM, ellen@clinic.net writes:
>
>
>
> So far no one besides me on this list has said publicly that the purchase of
> 37,000 acres by a club with a long history of support for trails might be a
> good thing.
>
>
>
> Well, I'm saying!!!!???? I am a member of AMC.? Many long distance hikers
> see the works of AMC through only the eyes of long distance hikers.? AMC
> existed long before the AT, before ATC, ALDHA, before the Sierra Club.? Trails in
> the White mountains were established and maintained by AMC before anyone
> dreamed of AT.?? The shelters, huts, and camping areas in NH were not constructed
> with long distance hikers in mind.? We share use of the wilderness, woods,
> and mountains of New England with organizations and private citizens that have
> been around longer than the AT. Almost all of tha AT in NH was established
> way before the AT.? We are borrowing those facilities.? Would we prefere land
> developers/speculators to purchase the logging lands along the trail in Maine
> or an organization such as AMC?? I believe we are way better off dealing with
> AMC.? If you want input in their decisions about use of that land join the
> organization and voice your opinion.? I suppose I'll get blasted for this
> response but that's ok.
>
> ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? Art
>