[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] AMC's "miscues" in the 100 Mile
A most fascinating dialogue. The most exciting development involving protection
of the Appalachian Trail since the Sterling Forest decisions a decade ago --
37,000 acres and 20 miles of trail buffers.
I posted first on the day the exciting development was announced by no less
than the Governor of Maine. The list may or may not have been down. I posted
again when I first could contact the list two days later, mentioning the
exciting news and added a link to a very fair and reasoned analysis of the
acquisition.
The first response was a post that called this "A rape of the
100-mile-wilderness." I saw the rape charge as I was leaving this morning for
an all day meeting on ways to protect the trail from being a wind power
industrial site. In the 30 seconds I had before leaving, I tried to suggest
that the rape charge was crap and that no one should take it seriously.
I returned after six hours of intense wind power discussion involving how to
raise and spend $50,000, maybe $100,000, in defense of the trail, only to find
not one post excited about this trail protection development, but a half dozen
posts praising the "news" that the most environmentally sensitive Governor in
decades is a "paper company whore."
Tell me again that this is a responsible list and that Wingfoot was wrong in
breaking away to do his own thing.
Weary