[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] OT & Non-PC: =?windows-1252?Q?=93Hiking_poles=94_?==?windows-1252?Q?to_=93Security=2E=94?=

Subject: [at-l] OT & Non-PC: =?windows-1252?Q?=93Hiking_poles=94_?==?windows-1252?Q?to_=93Security=2E=94?=
From: atlist at kens.com (Dog Tag)
Date: Sun Nov 9 13:31:51 2003
In-Reply-To: <Law10-F88eBa1kg3Ams00036af0@hotmail.com>
References: <Law10-F88eBa1kg3Ams00036af0@hotmail.com>

Steve Adams wrote:

> Shane,
> Reference your post, dated 11-8-03, subject heading, ?RE: [at-l] hiking 
> poles.?
> You single out an AT-L poster, and consider that his post regarding U.S. 
> security measures, ?... shows an extreme amount of immaturity.?

Actually, that was me, and the actual quote was "...To label (current 
security measures) "just a bother" shows an extreme amount of immaturity."

References:
- [at-l] OT & Non-PC: “Hiking poles” to “Security.”
  - From: Steve Adams

Prev by Date: [at-l] Snow & trail runners
Next by Date: [at-l] (no subject)
Prev by thread: [at-l] OT & Non-PC: “Hiking poles” to “Security.”
Next by thread: [at-l] Dutch Treat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread