[at-l] Re: AOL...

[gadog430 at charter.net (Gadog430)]

I still don't get why anyone is still on there. 
It's expensive, overly so. 
It doesn't offer any features that you can't get elsewhere. 
They could care less if you even are a member. 

What is the point?
Dawg


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <camojack@comcast.net>
To: <at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: [at-l] Re: AOL...


> GOOD answer! -"Camo"
> ------------------------------
> Message: 18
> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:47:14 -0600
> From: "Shane Steinkamp" <shane@theplacewithnoname.com>
> Subject: RE: [at-l] Test
> 
> > AOL people can send messages to the list all day long- but they can 
> > only receive messages sometimes.  
> > 
> > I haven't heard of a solution for this yet.
> 
> Ah, but there is a solution.  Get off AOL.
> 
> Shane
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>