[at-l] Re: Put a cork in it

[rickboudrie at hotmail.com (rick boudrie)]

>Nobody's said anything about Dave Ritchie - and the major problems preceded 
>Pam Underhill. What the hell are you talking about?
>

When do you think they became involved?  When do you think contoversies at 
Greymor took place?  How about many of the other examples?  Or are you 
simply more comfortable critisizing nameless/faceless organizations?

>You're welcome to your opinion, but if you want to talk about my IQ then 
>you should at least get it right - you need to read that stuff again cause 
>that wasn't quite what I told you.  If I'd wanted to put my IQ out here I'd 
>have done it myself long ago.  Why don't you mind your own damn business?

My apologies to Jim.  To correct the record, he only e-mailed a subset of 
listers that his IQ was "greater than pi radians".     Sorry to short change 
him by suggesting that his IQ was just 180, and not something greater than 
180.

For Jim and others who want to make sure that people like me don't betray 
confidences of "personal e-mails", I would strongly sugest that you mark the 
e-mail "Private" or "Off List".   More than a couple people have done just 
that recently, and I assure all of them that nothing you sent to me (Thanks, 
BTW) will find its way on this list.  At the very least, please make sure 
that any personal e-mail is addressed TO ONLY ME and not to a list of 3 or 4 
or more listeres in the in the "to line", as was the case with the one which 
I regrettably quoted above.  That way I won't miss the fact that it was not 
intended for the list as a whole.  As some of you may have figured out by my 
spelling, punctuation and sentace structure, I am one to read and respond 
very quickly.    Anyway,  I hope the correction sets things right.  Jim 
reported his IQ as GREATER than pi radians.

Go figure.

Rick B

_________________________________________________________________
Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon