[at-l] put a cork in it

[jplynch at crosslink.net (Jim Lynch)]

I have no position as far as this thread is concerned, just curiosity. 
The assertion was made early in the postings that ED had been used to 
obtain land (or right-of-way) for the AT.  The examples cited didn't 
seem to bear that out.  So I was interested in seeing if there were in 
fact any cases where ED was actually used.  We've found one.  I agree 
with you that there may be others, but they haven't turned up yet.


J Bryan Kramer wrote:
> Oh, so is your position now that this is the one and only use of ED? I don't
> have access to the case law libraries like Westlaw (IIRC) and so cannot
> search for more easily. But it would be unlikely that the one and only use
> of ED just happened to be on the web.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> "Si vis pacem para bellum"
> 
> 
>>It does appear that this is a case in which ED was used.  That's one.  16
>>acres in Vermont.
>>
>>J Bryan Kramer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>And for those who still claim that condemnation is not used,
>>
>>well look at
>>
>>>this Vermont case appeal court document:
>>>
>>>https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndCircuit/Pre95/92-6201.html
>>>
>>>Bryan
>>>
>>
>>James P. ('Jim') Lynch
>>jplynch@crosslink.net
>>

-- 

James P. ('Jim') Lynch
jplynch@crosslink.net