[at-l] Kennebec Bridge

[cwfrank at surry.net (Charles Frank)]

Better yet, build a tower so that the end of the cable is 40 feet high on
the south end and slopes down to the ground on the opposite shore. Then
attach a safety belt to yourself and a pulley on the cable and just glide
across. Oh I guess there should be a separate tower and cable going the
other way for the southbounders. Maybe it would be so much fun that people
would end up going back and forth over and over just for fun. Much like the
arguments about this topic.........................over and over and over
from both sides........LOL lighten up folks.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <RlphJoh@aol.com>
To: ""Bob C."" <ellen@clinic.net>; <RoksnRoots@aol.com>
Cc: <AT-L@Backcountry.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [at-l] Kennebec Bridge


> hmmmmmm  why not just strech a 1" steel (or lighter) cable across the
river and put on a safety belt and ford the river? Just a thought (smile)
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l