[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Re: Naming Katahdin
- Subject: [at-l] Re: Naming Katahdin
- From: rhymworm at mindspring.com (Robert Rubin)
- Date: Mon May 26 21:39:06 2003
- In-Reply-To: <20030526170010.8B610B6206@edina.hack.net>
The justification I've heard is that Katahdin means, in the native
Abenaki language, "greatest mountain" or "principal mountain." So,
calling it, "Mount Greatest Mountain" is a redundancy.
See also:
http://www.mainepbs.org/hometsom/prog2nmschrt.html
Rhymin' Worm
On Monday, May 26, 2003, at 01:00 PM,
at-l-request@mailman.backcountry.net wrote:
> Message: 26
> Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 11:45:58 -0400
> From: "The Weathercarrot" <weathercarrot@hotmail.com>
> Subject: [at-l] Naming Katahdin
> To: at-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> Message-ID: <BAY2-F132pFVjCRGryW00027f69@hotmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
> here's a question for ya'll -
>
> So I was labeling the final map of the project last night, and it
> occured to
> me that there are three different names for the northern terminus of
> the AT.
> They are:
>
> Baxter Peak
> Mount Katahdin
> Katahdin
>
> of course, Baxter Peak is is just one of a few peaks that make up
> katahdin,
> but i don't want to use both names - just one. The more interesting
> thing
> about this is that there has been some debate as to whether Katahdin
> has a
> "Mount" in front of it or not. It's on most any map you can find of the
> region, but I've run into enough people and situations that
> purposefully
> leave out the "mount", including the Data Book and the sign at the
> summit. I
> have always personally preferred leaving it out as well. I think it
> just
> sounds better that way.
>
> any thoughts?
>
> wc