Re[2]: Long, as usual <g> Re: [at-l] Re:Hiking for causes/Wingy

[Jim Bullard" <jbullar1@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Jim Bullard)]

Okay Ryan, I apologize in advance for this off-topic post but I must have
missed something when hitting DEL on this thread.

I want to be sure I understand this. Someone reported that WF's letter
writing campaign only forwarded those that agreed with his position? Did he
actually do that? Weary and RnR are defending that? Do I have that right?

----- Original Message -----
From: "J Bryan Kramer" <jbryankramer@msn.com>
To: "Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net>
Cc: <DaRedhead@aol.com>; <Snodrog5@aol.com>; <AT-L@backcountry.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Long, as usual <g> Re: [at-l] Re:Hiking for causes/Wingy


> When you set your self up as an honest broker who will forward messages to
a
> third party then honesty would demand that you indeed forward the messages
> or notify the sender that you are censoring messages and will not deliver
> his.
>
> Bryan
>
> >
> > >"...You adopt the standard 'end justifies the means' tactics of
> > the evironazis
> > >by suppressing comments that did not toe the party line.
> > Dishonesty in action
> > >as usual," says J. Bryan.
> >
> > Hmmm. Where is the internet rule that says one must help ones
> > opponents deliver
> > their messages? I must have missed it. We who participate are not
> > a newspaper
> > that pretends to objectivity. We are just ordinary folks trying
> > to do useful
> > things for the trail. BMMV (Bryans Mileage May Vary)
> >
> >   Weary
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> Change your options or unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>
> Stay on topic!
>