[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Re: Alcohol stoves; light weight?
- Subject: [at-l] Re: Alcohol stoves; light weight?
- From: papabear.nyc@xxxxxxxxxxx (Papa Bear)
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:57:55 -0400
I agree with the observations about some of the down sides of canister
stoves. It is hard to see how much fuel is left and you might occasionally
need to carry a second canister. In fact I'll add another downside: It's
hard to get it going when it's very cold. I was OK down to about 20
degrees, but below that (= winter camping) I would go with white gas.
The main point I was trying to make was not that the Pocket Rocket is
BETTER, but that under conditions that apply to me and many others it's
LIGHTER than alcohol. A lot of folks think the alcohol stove is the
ultimate lightweight solution: I'm just pointing out that they are not doing
the math.
There is a saying that thru-hikers end up loving their stoves and hating
heir water filters. I found that for all the trru-hikers I met in Maine
that was true (and they used every kind of stove you might imagine).
Pb