[at-l] RE: A difficult decision

[robert.hudock@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Hudock)]

Unfortuantely, the only way to counter-balance the threats to the trail
is to have lawyers, we live in a society governed by laws, at best any
monetary gains because the AMC did not pay for lawyers and lobbyists
would be lost when the next development project threatens the
appalachian trail (i.e. like the race track in PA).  Regards, Robert

On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 06:22, Clifford R. Haynes wrote:
> Obviously my money is better spent if I give it to someone that spends most
> of it on the trail rather than on hundreds of employees, legions of lawyers
> and 6 figure CEOs; or multi-million dollar convention centers and other
> projects to broaden AMC's profit base. I get a half dozen invitations a year
> to join AMC, and they go to the round file. The AMC doesn't need money from
> me they have plenty (certainly they have much more money than they need for
> the trail or conservation).
> Rocky
> > No flame, but I don't think the six-figure income is a fair criticism.  A
> > CEO, non-profit or not, that manages an organization with hundreds of
> > people, $20 million in revenues and a $45 million balance sheet warrants a
> > pretty high income, with or without his Harvard MBA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> >From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> Change your options or unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>
> Stay on topic!