[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?

Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
From: wdlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Walter Daniels)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 19:30:58 -0500
In-Reply-To: <17212036026.20030210191244@clinic.net>

> Speculation based on facts is useful. Speculation based on
> speculation isn't. Please. If anyone is truly interested in
> what, if anything, Wingfoot did that violates anyone's
> rights, they should start by asking the Appalachian Trail Conference.
>
>  Weary
>
And speculation by non-lawyers about copyright law is even less useful.

Follow-Ups:
- Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
  - From: Jim Bullard

References:
- Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
  - From: Bob C.

Prev by Date: Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
Next by Date: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
Prev by thread: Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
Next by thread: Re[2]: [at-l] Has Wingy ripped off the DataBook?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread