[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Megapixel Madness--

Subject: [at-l] Megapixel Madness--
From: jbryankramer@msn.com (J Bryan Kramer)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 10:10:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <cc.14d455d6.2affb0b6@aol.com>


> In another note, I should be getting my slides and negatives from the CDT
> back from Dale Labs this week.  I didn't get the prints or CD's
> as this would
> have added another $19 per roll for proccessing and I was also under the
> impression I could pick up a $60 Canon scanner that also scanned
> slides and
> negatives.  However, upon reading the reviews, the quality isn't
> very good.
> Has anyone here tried scanning slides?

I have a HP 4470 with a slide scanner attachment and I have to say scanning
slides is not a happy experience, the best I've been able to get out of them
is a grainy 4X6. Oddly scanning negatives produces good quality prints.

Bryan

Follow-Ups:
- Re[2]: [at-l] Megapixel Madness--
  - From: Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net (Bob C.)

References:
- [at-l] Megapixel Madness--
  - From: Slyatpct@aol.com (Slyatpct@aol.com)

Prev by Date: [at-l] CT's Cursed Dudley Town?
Next by Date: Re[4]: [at-l] You've gotta love it...
Prev by thread: [at-l] Megapixel Madness--
Next by thread: Re[2]: [at-l] Megapixel Madness--
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread