[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Re:at-l] AT Camera - Staring from Scratch
Time for my $0.02 woth.
Disposiable Cameras - getting better, have taken some very good quality pic=
tures with them. The real problem is that the people processing film don't=
cut the film properly.
Reqular film camera - expensive film, to get good quality pictures one need=
s to go some place other than wqalley mart. I use to develope my own black=
and white picture. Learned a while ago to use slow speed slide film to ta=
ke pictures. Excellent color density and really spectacular prints. Yes, =
Prints!!! Expensive, but you have them developed as slides and then you ta=
ke the best and have them made into prints. This is my choice. Disadvanta=
ge is that after 20 years or so the colours fade (both prints nad negatives=
Digital - have used and I personally do not like them (then of course I ha=
te windows. I miss by c:> prompt on my computer). The pictures appear to b=
e too two dimensional. There is not the same warmth in color and there is =
not much in the way of depth. Recently look at some truly spectacular blac=
k and white digital prints taken on a new black and white digital camera. =
Neither you or I can afford the camera as at this time there is only one of=
them. One nice advantage is that the digital prints can be downloaded str=
aight into a powerpoint presentation. I am going to stick with my slightl=
y heavy 1969 Cannon SLR camera.