[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Myers-Briggs

Subject: [at-l] Myers-Briggs
From: bullard@northnet.org (James Bullard)
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 20:46:11 -0400
References: <019201c25c0d$52e22dc0$0401a8c0@UHAdell> <5.1.0.14.2.20020914201425.034fe278@incoming.verizon.net>

Rafe B wrote:
> I asked my wife - a licensed psychologist and Ph.D. -
> about the Myers-Briggs test.  It seems she has a rather
> low opinion of this particular test; apparently there's
> not much validation for its results (in contrast to,
> for example, WAIS or MMPI

Hey, don't be knockin' MB.  My profile said my personality type has
difficulty remembering names.  Before that I just figured it was a character
flaw, now it's an *official* part of my personality.  :-)

sAunTerer

References:
- [at-l] Boredom (was Bryson's bookl)
  - From: Wilderness1" <wilderness1@starband.net (Wilderness1)
- [at-l] Myers-Briggs
  - From: rafe.bustin@verizon.net (Raphael Bustin)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Myers-Briggs
Next by Date: Re[2]: [at-l] Boredom (was Bryson's bookl)
Prev by thread: [at-l] Myers-Briggs
Next by thread: [at-l] Boredom (was Bryson's bookl)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread