[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[3]: [at-l] Cameras for the AT.
- Subject: Re[3]: [at-l] Cameras for the AT.
- From: Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net (Bob C.)
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 21:16:49 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <20020625161742.PNPK16548.out008.verizon.net@localhost>
- References: <20020625161742.PNPK16548.out008.verizon.net@localhost>
"...If the height of the pole isn't adjustable, and if there's no ball head on
the screw, how does this help with close-ups?"
The lack of adjustment is a problem. But I find by perching the end against a
stump or a rock my unadjustable monopod still helps in most situations. It
requires I shoot down at the flowers, rather than a profile view.
Since I essentially use my slides to illustrate what people see when walking the
AT or walking our land trust preserves, a top down view doesn't negate my
efforts.
However, from time to time, I crawl on the ground and find a rock on which to
rest my camera. The major value of the monopod is for photos that record the
middle range attributes of the trails -- patterns of moss on the rocks, a view
of the beaver cuttings, a church steeple framed by an ancient red oak....
Weary