[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Boy Scout Debate
At 01:24 PM 06/16/2002 -0400, rick boudrie wrote:
>>I wonder why Ed advocated as much as he did for formal recognition.
>>I'm also interested in the content of the letter sent to ATC in 2000. Was
>>it published, anyone? if so, which issue, I'd like to read
>
>If he was a strong advocate, that isn't so clear from his letter to the ATN:
>
>http://www.appalachiantrail.org/about/pubs/atn/archive/ATN00May.pdf
Interesting. It certainly doesn't sound like a campaign, just a letter
suggesting they be included. The "Paper Trail" article in the March-April
2001 ATN makes it sound like more, especially the quote on page 8 of Vice
Chair Brian Fitzgerald saying (in regard to the question of removing the
names) "I suspect that if the names just 'disappear,' we'll be hearing from
Mr. Talone again." That gave me the impression that there had been more
than just a single letter from him suggesting that the Boy Scouts deserved
to be listed.
[Rami:]
Your impression is correct as far as I have been able to determine. Brian King from ATC has told me that this became quite a heated issue in 1999 and 2000 with the Earl v. Max camps.
The editors' note et the end of Ed Talone's letter states simply that the
names were added in response to his letter. The ATC's argument has been
all along that "We are just not in a position now to verify claimed
hikes". It is quite evident that the ATC simply wishes the whole debate
would just go away but as I said before, like it or not they put themselves
in the business of verifying the first thru when they demanded proof from
Earl. An editor for the ATC (I assume the author of the article) is said
to have "investigated" Mr. Gordon's report which came up "when he contacted
the ATC on another matter". Evidently he was not even looking to be
recognized as the first thru-hiker.
[Rami:]
In fact, no formal request for listing was ever made by Max or any of the other 5 boys or even Mr. Talone. (according to Mr. King) The listing was because "A member (and AHS employee) was rooting around the archives and the 2,000-miler registry one weekend a couple winters back, "discovered" the article, and basically harangued the names into the registry. I did approve that, in an unfortunate, distracted moment, and
then forgot about it." and "As you've seen from the May 2000 ATN on-line, in response to a letter from that member, we then listed Max and the others in the printed update of the registry. This member then went to the ALDHA
newsletter editor with an article headlined "ATC Honors Scouts as First Thru-Hikers" or something like that. The editor was told by the group's coordinator at the time not to doublecheck with me"
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---