[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] RE: Why the Grand Unification Theory - isn't
- Subject: [at-l] RE: Why the Grand Unification Theory - isn't
- From: rafe.bustin@verizon.net (Raphael Bustin)
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 23:05:39 -0400
At 08:49 PM 6/4/2002 -0400, sAunTerer wrote:
> The thing to realize though is that what you are looking for isn't
> out in the woods either. It's just that the woods are a lot quieter
> and thus offer a conducive environment find it where it really is, in
yourself.
Well, you know I've heard this thought expressed before, but have
mixed feelings about it. I think of myself as pretty worldly, reasonably
well-read, well-traveled, etc. But I can and do get bored in the woods
after a while, especially if I haven't had a view of distant hills for a while.
There's only so much reflection and introspection I can tolerate --
after a while I need to talk about something, with someone, listen
to some music, read a book, look at art, laugh at some jokes, blow
off steam, light a candle, and curse the Liptons.
There aren't enough deep thoughts in my head to keep me amused
from Springer to Wesser, let alone Springer to Katahdin.
rafe b.
aka terrapin