[at-l] sticks???

[orangebug74@yahoo.com (Orange Bug)]

Zero is an option also. 

I prefer two trekking poles, with the obvious option to collapse them
and walk freely in areas that simply won't work well with them. For
instance, Albert Mtn or Agony Grind demand that you simply get your
hands and feet free to climb and hop around on the rocks. As your trail
legs get in gear, frequently you will find that trekking poles can slow
you somewhat on level ground, also. 

But while in steady climbs, tricky areas needing more balance, first
days after resupply and such - trekking poles are real handy. There are
options for them to serve as tent and tarp supports, also. There is the
running controversy that the tips may damage the trail bed, although I
am not aware that this has been settled. One could use rubber covers
over the carbide tips, if you were so inclined.

If you consider trekking poles, make sure someone demonstrates and
teaches you how to use them. It is not at all intuitive, as you don't
use the handles as much as you use the wrist straps and swing the poles
ahead of you. Once you get the hang of it, you will find some benefit.

Bill...

--- RBSC2000@aol.com wrote:
> 1   OR      2     ?      Reaction please......
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com