[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

foodage per day confusion.... Re: [at-l] is 4300 cu. in. big enough?

Subject: foodage per day confusion.... Re: [at-l] is 4300 cu. in. big enough?
From: jbkramer@afn.org (Bryan Kramer)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 17:25:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <003b01c1e734$e6347e00$2a5ca441@com>

I saw something that said that 3000 cals in MRE weighs 5 pounds because
of the high water content. I have no idea how corect that is though.

Bryan


> He also sites the US Army's allowance of 4400 cals for heavy 
> work, 3600 for normal work, and 2800 for sedentary jobs.  
> [Anyone out there know the current MRE cal content?]
> 
> Bottom line, IMHO, is that with good food management the 1 
> 1/2 to 2 pound rule of thumb is a good one.

Follow-Ups:
- foodage per day confusion.... Re: [at-l] is 4300 cu. in. big enough?
  - From: daveh@psknet.com (Dave Hicks)

References:
- foodage per day confusion.... Re: [at-l] is 4300 cu. in. big enough?
  - From: daveh@psknet.com (Dave Hicks)

Prev by Date: [at-l] RE: Argh! Silnylon vs cat pee
Next by Date: [at-l] PLEDGE TOTALS NOON UPDATE: Keep the List Friendly (AT-L/ATC fundraiser)
Prev by thread: foodage per day confusion.... Re: [at-l] is 4300 cu. in. big enough?
Next by thread: foodage per day confusion.... Re: [at-l] is 4300 cu. in. big enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread