[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Seriously Speaking....

Subject: [at-l] Seriously Speaking....
From: jplynch@crosslink.net (Jim Lynch)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:18:34 -0500
References: <cd.151a5335.29d3c202@aol.com>

Slyatpct@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Does anyone believe that by taking separate blue blazes in and out of
> shelters is being dishonest when it comes to applying for a 2000-miler rocker?
> 
I seem to recall that the Avery Award criteria expressly allowed
in-and-out trails to AT shelters (memory check, please!).  My personal
opinion is that its ok, but I'd like to see if there is general group
consensus on this.  

-- 
James P. ('Jim') Lynch
jplynch@crosslink.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re[2]: [at-l] Seriously Speaking....
  - From: Bob Cummings <ellen@clinic.net> (Bob C.)

References:
- [at-l] Seriously Speaking....
  - From: Slyatpct@aol.com (Slyatpct@aol.com)

Prev by Date: [at-l] NJ-ME: NB or SB?
Next by Date: [at-l] Signing Off....
Prev by thread: [at-l] Seriously Speaking....
Next by thread: Re[2]: [at-l] Seriously Speaking....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread